Tag Archives: social violence

New Books on Violence – Women Suicide Bombers / Violence in Post-Conflict Societies / Micro-Sociology of Violence

– Julie Rajan, Women Suicide Bombers. Narratives of Violence, Routledge Critical Terrorism Studies,  April 2011

Publisher’s comments:

This book offers an evaluation of female suicide bombers through postcolonial, Third World, feminist, and human-rights framework, drawing on case studies from conflicts in Palestine, Sri Lanka, and Chechnya, among others.

Women Suicide Bombers explores why cultural, media and political reports from various geographies present different information about and portraits of the same women suicide bombers. The majority of Western media and sovereign states engaged in wars against groups deploying bombings tend to focus on women bombers’ abnormal mental conditions; their physicality-for example, their painted fingernails or their beautiful eyes; their sexualities; and the various ways in which they have been victimized by their backward Third World cultures, especially by “Islam.” In contrast, propaganda produced by rebel groups deploying women bombers, cultures supporting those campaigns, and governments of those nations at war with sovereign states and Western nations tend to project women bombers as mythical heroes, in ways that supersedes the martyrdom operations of male bombers.

Many of the books published on this phenomenon have revealed interesting ways to read women bombers’ subjectivities, but do not explore the phenomenon of women bombers both inside and outside of their militant activities, or against the patriarchal, Orientalist, and Western feminist cultural and theoretical frameworks that label female bombers primarily as victims of backward cultures. In contrast, this book offers a corrective lens to the existing discourse, and encourages a more balanced evaluation of women bombers in contemporary conflict.

– Andres Themner, Violence in Post-Conflict Societies. Remarginalization, Remobilizers and Relationships,  Routledge Studies in Intervention and Statebuilding’ Series, May 2011

Synopsis:

This book compares post-civil war societies to look at the presence or absence of organized violence, analysing why some ex-combatants return to organised violence and others do not. Even though former fighters have been identified as a major source of insecurity, there have been few efforts to systematically examine why some ex-combatants re-engage in organized violence, while others do not. This book compares the presence or absence of organized violence in different ex-combatant communities — former fighters that used to belong to the same armed faction and who share a common, horizontal identity based on shared war-and peacetime experiences — in the Republic of Congo (ex-Cobras, Cocoyes and Ninjas) and Sierra Leone (ex-Armed Forces Revolutionary Council, Civil Defense Force and Revolutionary United Front). The main determinants of ex-combatant violence are whether former fighters have access to elites and to second-tier individuals — such as former mid-level commanders — who can act as intermediaries between the two. By utilizing relationships based on selective incentives and social networks, these two kinds of remobilizers are able to generate the needed enticements and feelings of affinity, trust or fear to convince ex-combatants to resort to arms. These findings demonstrate that the outbreak of ex-combatant violence can only be understood by more clearly incorporating an actor perspective, focusing on three levels of analysis: the elite, midlevel and grass-root. This book will be of much interest to students of peacebuilding, civil wars, post-conflict reconstruction, war and conflict studies, security studies and IR.

– Jutta Bakonyi (Ed), A Micro-Sociology of Violence. Deciphering Patterns and Dynamics of Collective Violence   December 2011

Description:

This book aims at a deeper understanding of social processes, dynamics and institutions shaping collective violence. It argues that violence is a social practice that adheres to social logics and, in its collective form, appears as recurrent patterns. In search of characteristics, mechanisms and logics of violence, contributions deliver ethnographic descriptions of different forms of collective violence and contextualize these phenomena within broader spatial and temporal structures. The studies show that collective violence, at least if it is sustained over a certain period of time, aims at organization and therefore develops constitutive and integrative mechanisms. Practices of social mobilization of people and economic resources, their integration in functional structures, and the justification or legitimization of these structures sooner or later lead to the establishment of new forms of (violent) orders, be it at the margins of or beyond the state. Cases discussed include riots in Gujarat, India, mass violence in Somalia, social orders of violence and non-violence in Colombia, humanitarian camps in Uganda, trophy-taking in North America, and violent livestock raiding in Kenya.This book was originally published as a special issue of Civil Wars.

 Contents:

1. Deciphering the Mosaic’s Tesserae: A Micro-Sociology of Violence Jutta Bakonyi and Berit Bliesemann de Guevara 2. Rioting as Maintaining Relations: Hindu-Muslim Violence and Political Mediation in Gujarat, India Ward Berenschot 3. Moral Economies of Mass Violence: Somalia 1988-1991 Jutta Bakonyi 4. Displacing, Returning, and Pilgrimaging: The Construction of Social Orders of Violence and Non-violence in Colombia Nora-Christine Braun 5. Humanitarianism, Violence, and the Camp in Northern Uganda Adam Branch 6. ‘Transgressive Objects’ in America: Mimesis and Violence in the Collection of Trophies during the Nineteenth Century Indian Wars Cora Bender 7. Of Rains and Raids: Violent Lifestock Raiding in Northern Kenya Karen M. Witsenburg and Adano R. Wario

News in Brief / Publications – “The New nobility” now in French + New Book & Dictionary on Violence + Newsletter on Extremism and Democracy + Journal Issue on Violence in Politics

  • Les héritiers du KGBThe book by Andrey Soldatov and Irina Borogan The new Nobility: the restoration of Russia’s Security state and the enduring legacy of the KGB (see our post)  has been translated into French : “Les Héritiers du KGB. Enquête sur les nouveaux boyards”, Paris, François Bourin.

On Thursday 3 November at 7.30PM, presentation of the book with Andrey Soldatov.

 Adress : Librairie du Globe 67 bd Beaumarchais, Paris (métro Bastille ou Chemin vert)
 
  • New book by French sociologist Laurent Muchielli, leading specialist on police and crime issues – L’invention de la violence: des peurs, des chiffres, des faits (the invention of violence : fears, figures and facts).  more on his blog

 

  • The latest issue of the French journal “Culture & Conflits” is dealing with scholarly debates and field research on the problem of political or social struggles and movements resorting to violence. See table of content

 

  • Marzano Michela (dir), Dictionnaire de la violence, Paris, PUF, 2011, 1552p.

New Database – Conflicts in the Russian Media – Impunity Project

The Impunity Project

The “Russia – Conflicts in the Media” website is the continuation of the Impunity Project started by an international partnership of journalists’ unions and media organizations in 2007. The two phases have involved the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ, Brussels), its member organization the Russian Union of Journalists (Moscow), and Russia’s own two leading media monitors – the Glasnost Defence Foundation and the Centre for Journalism in Extreme Situations, both based in Moscow.

The new database “Conflicts in the Media” and the other resources assembled on this website (articles by monitors, overview of legislation, annual survey of media freedom and violations) complement the earlier “Deaths and Disappearances of Journalists in Russia since 1993” database. The latter was launched in June 2009 together with thePartial Justice report (see http://journalists-in-russia.org). The pioneering work in modelling and refining online versions of the two databases has been carried out under the supervision of Damian Counsell, with the assistance of Tim Almond.

The purpose of the “Deaths and Disappearances” database was to pinpoint the targeted killing of journalists in Russia since 1993, and monitor the level of impunity for such violence. The new database has a wider and more pro-active role. By documenting instances of assault, criminal prosecution, threats, dismissal, censorship and arrest, the “Conflicts in the Media” database offers a broad picture of the changing situation in different parts of the Russian Federation. More specifically, it provides an early warning of the emergence of particular threats, whether directed against the media of a region or against an individual journalist.

We are indebted to the Open Society Institute (London) which, through the IFJ, has funded both stages of the ongoing Impunity Project and has taken an active interest in its creation and further development. We also wish to thank the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media for enabling us, in the nearest future, to add past years’ records to this database.

Contacts for this project

John Crowfoot, IFJ analyst (London) – crowfoot@uwclub.net

Boris Timoshenko, GDF head of monitoring (Moscow) – boris@gdf.ru

(Presentation retrieved from the site http://mediaconflictsinrussia.org/about-this-site/).

International Workshop – Radical Youth, Between Ideology, Expressivity and Violence : Comparisons Around the Russian Experience – 20/21 October 2011, Paris

 

 

Radical Youth, between ideology, expressivity and violence:

Comparisons around the Russian experience

International Workshop

2021 October 2011, EHESS, Paris

Under the Research project “Understanding Violence in Russia: War, Institutions, Society” with the support of the City of Paris “Emergence(s) program”

 

 

Skin-heads, hooligans, extremists, are the labels usually used by the media to name radical youth not only in Russia, but also in European countries, were a radicalization of the youth, and especially the rise of extreme-right movements has been observed for several years. In Russia, the “Manezh square” demonstration of “football fans” and extreme right in front of the Kremlin in December 2011 has shed

light on the capacities of mobilization, but also on the different dimensions of these movements. Together with violence against minorities and nationalist slogans, there is an increasing hostile behavior against State authorities. But among radical youth are also all movements that were born in reaction or protestation against the ultra-rights, and movements shaped by a specific sub culture and individual identity search.

Mainly based on field research undertaken on the Russian field, and interplaying the Russian experience with cases and researches from other several European countries such as France, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and Poland, the international workshop “Youth, between ideology, expressivity and violence” will gather leading and young specialists of the radical youth.

We hope to be able to draw some lines of comparison (between radical expressions all over Europe including Russia. In the Russian case, the rise of Russian contemporary ultra-nationalist movement will be analysed in its social and political context and in its expression such as the riots in Kondopoga in September 2006 and Manezh Square Demonstration. But we understand youth radicality and radical movements in a broader sense, which encompasses ideology, as well as cultural and artistic expressions and a violent behaviour.

We are particularly interested in the combination of a subjective dimension (the experience of a “radical” individual) with a global dimension (the experience of such movements in several countries, the resort to physical violence, the link between age and political and social attitudes).

The participants will present research on various types of youth radicality and radical movements, whether it refers to “right” or “left” ideologies (radical nationalists, anti-racists or anarchists). The choice of a broad spectrum of movements will help to draw the lines on how to describe “radicality” and “radical movements”.

In this context, the reflection on the role and place of violence (symbolic, physical, use of weapons, etc.) in their practices and ideology will take a large place in our workshop.

The participants will also address the status of empirical research and in such a sensitive context.

The workshop will give the opportunity to analyse the attitudes of youth radical movements to politics and to State authorities, as well as the State reactions to their activities. How these movements do position themselves in relation to their society and how society perceives them? The discussion will stimulate reflection and experiences common to Russia and Europe, by highlighting common features and characteristics of institutional, political and cultural trajectories.

 

 

The workshop will be organized around three panels :

Panel I : Theories, ideologies and typology of youth radicality and radical mouvements

Panel II : The role and place of violence in the youth radical movements

Panel III : Studying empirically the youth radicality and radical movements. Fields and researcher’s experience

 

Venue : EHESS, 190-198 avenue de France 75013 Paris (M Quai de la Gare or Bibliothèque)

  • 20 October, 13.00-19.00 : room 640 6th floor
  • 21 October, 9.00-13.00room A, Ground floor

Participants:

  • Philippe Bataille, Director of the  CADIS (EHESS/CNRS), France
  • Alexander Bikbov, Moscow University, Centre Maurice Halbwachs (Paris), Russia
  • Manuel Boucher, Laboratory for the Study and Social Researches, Rouen, CADIS, France,
  • Antimo Luigi Farro, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, CADIS, ISA Research Committee 47, President, Italy
  • Mischa Gabowitsch, research fellow at Einstein Forum, Potsdam, Allemagne
  • Lukasz Jurczyszyn, Pultusk Academy of Humanities, CADIS, ISA RC 47, Poland
  • Anne Le Huérou, FMSH, CERCEC, France
  • Elena Omelchenko, director of the Centre for youth studies of the Higher School of Economics in St.Petersburg, Russia
  • Hilary Pilkington, Warwick University, United Kingdom
  • Geoffrey Pleyers, Louvain University, CADIS, AFS RT 21, ISA RC 47, Belgique
  • Vera Nikolski, Paris 1/CESS, France
  • Daniele Di Nunzio, Institute for the Economic and Social Research (IRES), Rome, Italy
  • Amandine Regamey, University Paris I, CERCEC, France
  • Emanuele Toscano, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, CADIS, ISA RC47, Italy
  • Alexander Verhovsky, Director, Centre for Information and Analysis “SOVA”, Moscow, Russia
  • Michel Wieviorka, FMSH Administrator, CADIS

Contacts :Anne le Huérou: anne.lehuerou@free.fr, Lukasz Jurczyszyn: jurluk@ehess.fr, Geoffrey Pleyers: Geoffrey.Pleyers@uclouvain.be

see the project site http://russiaviolence.hypotheses.org

WORSHOP PROGRAM

Thursday, 20 october

(salle 640, EHESS, 190-198 avenue de France)

13.00 Welcome – Anne Le Huérou, FMSH, CERCEC, Philippe Bataille, directeur du CADIS/EHESS, Lukasz Jurczyszyn Pultusk Academy of Humanities, CADIS

Introduction – Antimo Luigi Farro, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, CADIS, ISA Research Committee 47, President

 

13.30-16.00 PANEL SESSION I : Theories, ideologies and typology of youth radicality and radical mouvements 

Panelists:

  • Race and ethnicity, nationalism and extremism: some comparative historical observations, Mischa Gabowitsch  (research fellow at Einstein Forum)
  • The place of the ultra-nationalists in the Russian society: up to and after the Manezh Square, Alexander Verhovsky (Centre for Information and Analysis “SOVA”, Moscow)
  • Rethinking ‘subcultural’ lives: Journeys through skinhead, Hilary Pilkington (Warwick University) and Elena Omelchenko (director of the Centre for youth studies of the Higher School of Economics in St.Petersburg)

Discussant: Michel Wieviorka, FMSH Administrator, Professor, EHESS CADIS (to be confirmed)

16.00-16.30 Coffee/Tea break

 

16.30-18.00 PANEL SESSION II : The role and place of violence in the youth radical movements

Panelists :

  • The meaning of violence in the youth radical movements. Study cases in France, Russia and Poland, Lukasz Jurczyszyn (Pultusk Academy of Humanities, CADIS)
  • Violence under the circumstances: a biographical construction of Russian youth militantism, Alexander Bikbov  (Moscow University, Centre Maurice Halbwachs – Paris)

Discussant: Mischa Gabowitsch (research fellow at Einstein Forum)

18.00-18.30 : a summary of the first part of the Workshop in relation to the theories of social movements, Geoffrey Pleyers (Louvain University, CADIS, RT 21 AFS)

 

 

Friday, 21 october

(Salle A, Ground floor, EHESS, 190-198 avenue de France)

09.00-10.30 PANEL SESSION III : Studying empirically the youth radicality and radical movements. Fields and researcher’s experience 

Panelists:

  • Les rapports police/jeunes au sein des quartiers impopulaires : analyse d’un processus de “radicalisation réciproque”, Manuel Boucher (Laboratory for the Study and Social Research, Rouen)
  • L’escapisme en politique: le cas des militants du NBP et de l’ESM Vera Nikolski (Paris 1 / CESSP)
  • „Taking everything back“. A sociological reading of CasaPound, a far right movement in Italy, Emanuele Toscano, University of Rome and Daniele Di Nunzio, Institute for the Economic and Social Research (IRES)

Discussant: Anne le Huérou, CERCEC

10.30-11.00  Coffee/Tea break

11.00-12.30 To film the Russian field. Projection of two films on Russian radical youth in order to discuss with the authors some reflections about the methodological and ethical issues.  

  • Vorkuta: A research film”, Directed by Elena Omel’chenko, edited by Dmitrii Omel’chenko, Vorkuta 2007. Elena Elena Omelchenko, director of the Centre for youth studies of the Higher School of Economics, St.Petersburg and Hilary Pilkington, Warwick University, Great-Britain.
  • “Ce que voit Minine”, directed  by Lukasz Jurczyszyn and Marcin Grabowski, Nijni-Novgorod 2010. Lukasz Jurczyszyn, Pultusk Academy of Humanities, CADIS.

12.30-13.00 General Conclusions

 

programme en pdf Programme Workshops Radical Movements-1

 

 

Violence towards Disabled Veterans of the Chechen Wars in Post-Soviet Russia – Work in Progress / Presentation – Post 1/5

From Combat Trauma to Abandonment and Social Marginalization.

Violence towards Disabled Veterans of the Chechen Wars in Post-Soviet Russia

Elisabeth Sieca-Kozlowski

This post is the first of a series of 5 dedicated to violence towards disabled veterans of the Chechen wars in post-Soviet Russia. The research conducted is a work in progress.

The first steps and hypotheses were presented at the Franco-German workshop on Culture and Experience of Violence in the Russian History (programm and details available on http://lodel.ehess.fr/cercec/docannexe.php?id=1684) titled “5èmes Journées franco-allemandes – Culture et expérience de la violence dans l’histoire russe” – Culture and experience of violence en Russian history”,  Supported by Fritz Thyssen Foundation, Cologne on the 8/9 September 2011 in Paris.

In 2010, I conducted 15 interviews of veterans of the Chechen wars – among the interviewees were officers, kontraktniki, military journalists, conscripts met thanks to the help of the Veterans Organization Boevoe Bratstvo as well as the Moscow Cheshire Home, which supports disabled military servicemen by providing temporary accommodation, meals, health and medical care and assisting in the provision of prostheses.

As many studies have shown, violence is very present in the military (in particular with dedovshchina) and outside the military -through the vector of  veterans. But during these interviews I was struck to hear that violence is also present in many forms not only in the servicemen’s experience on the battlefield but at every stage of their experience of disability, through the healing  process and the return to civil life. Interviews show that interviewees have been faced with violence and brutality on the part of their commanders, doctors, and have been abandoned by the state. Not only have they been exposed to the brutality of war, its physical violence but have they encountered « betrayal » (that is the word used), despise, neglect, violence, disengagement from the doctors and from the state. Violence is particularly exerted on conscripts. Aware of the violence undergone by this category of servicemen, one of my interviewers – an officer – created his own organization to help conscripts back from the Chechen war[1]. Although the history of the Soviet Union shows that lost wars as much as victorious ones lead to the social abandonment of veterans, the fate of disabled veterans seems to be particularily acute and conditionned by a cultural heritage from the Soviet time which glorifies a muscular body and favors work capacity as a criterion for citizenship.

Through 4 more posts, I will share the material of my research – notably 3 interviews with 3 conscripts-invalids who participated to the Chechen warss (posts 2 to 4). The final post (post 5) will be dedicated to the first steps and hypotheses of that research.

– Post 1/5 – Presentation (in English)

– Post 2/5 – Interview (in French) with Sergei, 35 years old, born in Novokuznetski, Kemerovo region. Conscript during the first Chechen war, injured during the storm of Grozny in 1994 (interview conducted in July 2010).

– Post 3/5 – Interview  (in French) with Valentin, 27 years old, born in St-Petersburg, voluntary conscript during the second Chechen War. He was injured by a mine while crossing a Russian minefield as ordered by his (drunk) commanding officer on the Armed Forces Day (interview conducted in July 2010).

– Post 4/5 – Interview  (in French) with Alexander, 28 years old, born in Kovrov, Vladimir Region, voluntary conscript during the second Chechen war. He was injured by a defecting weapon – his commanding officers and himself having full knowledge of this fact (interview conducted in July 2010).

– Post 5/5 – First steps and hypotheses


[1] Interview with Gennadi, officer, founder of the Rusich Organization. Boevoe Bratstvo, Moscow, 8 July 2010.

Conference – Call for Papers – Physical Violence in Late Socialism: (Dis-) Entangling Statehood, Labor, and the Nation

First Annual Conference: Physical Violence in Late Socialism: (Dis-)Entangling Statehood, Labor, and the Nation

 Institute for East and South East European Studies (IOS)

Landshuter Str. 4, 93047 Regensburg

19 – 21 April 2012

CALL FOR PAPERS

The international joint research project “Physical Violence and State Legitimacy in Late Socialism” was launched in April 2011 (see www.physicalviolence.eu, online in October). The project, which is coordinated by the Center for Contemporary History (ZZF) in Potsdam, focuses on physical violence in the late socialist societies of Eastern and Southeastern Europe and on the state’s response to and practice of physical violence. The Südost-Institut, as one of the partner institutions, calls for proposals for the project’s first annual conference, to be held on 19 – 21 April 2012 at the newly-founded Institute for East and South East European Studies (IOS) in Regensburg (formerly Südost-Institut and Osteuropa-Institut).

By stressing the notion of physical violence and its significance for state legitimacy, the project seeks to contribute to the general discussion of late socialist societies. The first annual conference will explore physical violence within two core fields related to the legitimatory strategies and discourses of communist statehood: the social and the national. By contextualizing physical violence within these highly ambiguous fields, we aim to contribute to the dismantling of powerful stereotypical narrations and images of state socialism; for example, the remnants of binary mental maps coined by the Cold War or interpretations that have emerged on the grounds of post-socialist nation-(re)building.

1. Violence in Labor and Social Relations

Communist regimes used violence to shape social relations, and violence was also part and parcel of revolutionary rhetoric. One of the pertinent aims of communist societal policies was the creation of a socialist working class. Yet, labor relations were highly ambiguous, and workers also constituted a potentially subversive force. What role did violence play in coming to terms with these ambivalences? How did violence (re-)shape social relations, in particular with regard to workers? Which practices of violence exercised by workers can be identified, and how did the state relate to them? Which forms of violence did the late socialist state apply, in order to influence and forge social relations according to its needs and visions?

2. The National Factor in Shaping Violence

The national, as a world of meaning, continued to be interwoven into state legitimatory practices as well as into processes of group-building during the Communist period. We look for contributions that conceptualize the nation as a process, an institutionalized form, a practical category, a contingent, and a context dependent event, and discuss the role of violence for shaping the national. Proposals should seek to identify ethnic biases inherent in the violence exercised by the state and by social actors, including questions like the following: Did police violence look different (quicker, harsher, more lenient), depending on the ethnic background of who was involved? Can ethnic prejudice be detected in the treatment of soldiers? Was judicial punishment conditioned by ethnicity? How did state institutions and social actors refer to the nation when violence occurred, for example in managing border regimes, in reacting to xenophobia, to violence against ethnic minorities? Given that the party collapsed upon the demise of state socialism, while the (nation-)states prevailed or were (re-)established, proposals are invited to seek lines of continuity between the Communist era and both the pre- and post-socialist periods, exploring the systemic interconnectivities of nationally motivated violence.

We invite proposals striving for a situational and contextualised “thick description” of practices, experiences, and representations of physical violence from the perspective of the historical actors, both in terms of subversive strategies and the expression of state authority. Violence is to be approached through a quadruple lens as exercised, suffered, observed and/or imagined.

The conference language is English.

Proposals should be no longer than 300 words. Please also include a short biographic note and your institutional affiliation, as well as your contact details.

Deadline: 31 October, 2011.

Contact:

Dr. Sabine Rutar, Südost-Institut, Landshuter Str. 4, 93047 Regensburg, rutar@suedost-institut.de (http://www.suedost-institut.de).

Culture & Experience of Violence in Russian History – Workshop in Paris

On September 8th and 9th, CERCEC is hosting in Paris a 2 days Franco-German workshop on Culture and Experience of Violence in the Russian History.

programm and details available on http://lodel.ehess.fr/cercec/docannexe.php?id=1684

 

5èmes Journées franco-allemandes

Culture et expérience de la violence dans l’histoire russe

5. Deutsch-französischer Workshop

Gewaltkultur und Gewalterfahrung in der russischen Geschichte

Supported by Fritz Thyssen Foundation, Cologne

Thursday, 8 September 2011 14.00-14.30 Welcome and Introduction

  •  Jörg Baberowski and Alain Blum 14.30-15.00 Mobilising Fighters
  • Stefan Wiese: The „Pogrom Paradigm”. A Case Study on the Role of the Black Hundreds and Jewish Self-Defense in 1905

15.00-16.00 Elite Violence

  • Tadzio Schilling: Deadly Jokes? Laughing and Dying in Stalin’s Kremlin  Andreas Oberender: Stealing from the State. The 1937-1938 Purge of Soviet Economic Officials Reconsidered

Coffee & Tea Break

16.30-17.30 Trickling Down, Creeping Up  Botakoz Kassymbekova: Raped by the State? Cases of Sexual Violence in Early Soviet Courts

  •  Anastasia Gorelik: Violence, Mass Media and the Putin Cult

Dîner

Friday, 9 September 2011 9.30-10.30 Civil Wars and Famines

  •  Thomas Chopard: The Origins of the Ukrainian Famine, 1919-1923  Robert Kindler: Fear and Loathing in the Steppe. Civil Wars in Kazakhstan, 1929-1931

10.45-11.45 Soldiering for the Motherland

  •  Masha Cerovic: From Peace to War. Demobilization and Remobilization in German- occupied Soviet Territories, 1941-1942
  •  Elisabeth Sieca-Kozlowski: From Combat Trauma to Abandonment and Marginalization. State Violence towards Disabled Veterans of the Chechen Wars

12.00-13.00 Grappling with Nature, Human and Other

  •  Christian Teichmann: Changing Tides on the Oxus. The Lower Amu Daria, 1920s to 1940s  Marc Élie: Dessicated Steppes. Droughts, Erosion, Climate Change and the Crisis of Soviet

Agriculture, 1960s to 1980s

Lunch Break

14.00-15.00 Reprisals on Religion

  •  Ulrike Huhn: Popular Religious Celebrations after the Great War  Nikolai Mitrokhin: Persecuting Religious Believers in the Brezhnev Era.

Institutional and Personal Responsibilities 15.15-16.00 Memories and Memorials

  •  Alain Blum, Isabelle Ohayon and Marta Craveri: The Oral History Project „Archives sonores. Mémoires européennes du Goulag“

16.00-17.00 Comments, Conclusions  Susanne Schattenberg and Gabor Rittersporn

Venue

Centre d’études des mondes russe, caucasien et centre-européen 44, rue de l’Amiral Mouchez 75014 Paris

http://cercec.ehess.fr

Organisation

Lehrstuhl Geschichte Osteuropas Institut für Geschichtswissenschaften Philosophische Fakultät I Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Unter den Linden 6

10099 Berlin

http://oeg.geschichte.hu-berlin.de

Funding

Fritz Thyssen Stiftung Apostelnkloster 13-15 50672 Köln http://www .fritz-thyssen-stiftung.de